By Farooq Tantary
Administrative Turmoil in Pahalgam: Allegations, Inequality, and the Transfer of CEO Masarat HashmiThe short tenure of Masarat Hashmi as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Pahalgam Development Authority (PDA) was marked by controversy, allegations of favoritism, and
widespread frustration among local residents. Over a period of just three months, a stark divide reportedly emerged between influential individuals who allegedly carried out illegal constructions without hindrance and the
common people, who struggled to get approvals even for essential repairs.Pahalgam, a region known for its breathtaking beauty and strict environmental regulations, has long been a hotbed for disputes over land use and
construction. During Hashmi’s tenure, locals accused the administration of double standards—where the wealthy and influential individuals were allegedly allowed to build unauthorized
structures, while ordinary residents were denied even minor repairs to their old homes and AAY (Antyodaya Anna Yojana) huts.For years, the High Court’s blanket ban on all new constructions had created a difficult situation for the native population, many of whom lived in deteriorating homes.
However, during Hashmi’s tenure, the disparity in enforcement seemed to reach new heights, with reports of hotel constructions proceeding unchecked while poor residents were left struggling to maintain their existing homes.As the situation worsened, public anger grew.
The people of Pahalgam repeatedly voiced their concerns, demanding a fair and transparent system where rules applied equally to all.
Protests, petitions, and appeals to higher authorities became commonplace as residents sought justice and an end to what they called “Mafia Raj”—a term used to describe the unchecked power of influential builders and hoteliers allegedly benefiting from administrative favoritism.
The pressure mounted on the administration, and local leaders joined the chorus of voices calling for the transfer of Hashmi.
They argued that only a change in leadership could restore fairness and ensure that the law was applied without bias.Finally, after months of growing unrest, Masarat Hashmi was transferred from his position as CEO of PDA. His removal was met with visible relief among the locals, who saw it as a step toward justice and a victory against corruption.
Many residents openly expressed gratitude to the administration for addressing their grievances and hoped that the new leadership would prioritize equitable treatment for all citizens.
However, questions remain about the future of Pahalgam’s development policies. Will the new CEO ensure that laws are applied equally? Will illegal constructions by powerful individuals continue under a different administration?
The events surrounding Hashmi’s tenure highlight the ongoing struggle between development, environmental conservation, and social justice in Pahalgam. The allegations of preferential treatment toward wealthy individuals at the cost of the local population underline the urgent need for transparent, accountable governance.
As Pahalgam moves forward, the public will be watching closely to see if the administration upholds its responsibility to ensure fair and equal treatment for all—without bending rules for the powerful while suppressing the weak.
The people have won a battle, but the war for justice and equality in Pahalgam’s governance is far from over.